Natural Gas Drilling in Sullivan County, NY

Note : New information is presented as it becomes available. Opposing views are included.

Entries run from newest to oldest content.

Natural Gas Drilling Map

From:  http://www.dailyyonder.com/take-gas-leave-roads/2010/03/08/2626

******************************************************************************

Drilling proponents, foes square off in New PaltzText Size:

By Steve Israel
Times Herald-Record
Posted: March 09, 2010 - 2:00 AM

NEW PALTZ — Why has natural-gas drilling been discussed and debated, praised and protested everywhere from a youth center in the western Sullivan County hamlet of Callicoon to the halls of Congress — and, on Monday night, at SUNY New Paltz?

Because whether folks are for or against it, just about everyone agrees that drilling the gas-rich Marcellus shale, which sits beneath Sullivan and parts of Ulster counties, will profoundly change lives.

"A game changer," said Scott Rotruck, a vice president of Chesapeake Energy. He was the only pro-drilling member of the SUNY New Paltz panel that included two representatives of environmental groups, the executive deputy commissioner of the Department of Environmental Conservation and the chairman of the New York City Council's Environmental Protection Committee. Rep. Maurice Hinchey, D-Hurley, was the keynote speaker.
Proponents such as Rotruck once again said drilling is medicine for an ailing New York.

"It will immediately provide jobs and energy and economic independence," he said. 

Those against it — including New York City and most of the crowd of some 200 Monday night — again said drilling, or specifically, the horizontal drilling technique called "fracking," will pollute the water and scar the pristine land atop the shale.

"The industrialization of the landscape," said Kate Sinding, senior attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council, pointing to incidents of pollution in Western states.

The debate has intensified over the past few months, as the state prepares new regulations for drilling.

But Monday night, several speakers said the proposed rules fall short — even though the DEC is still reviewing more than 10,000 comments on them and apparently incorporating changes.

"This document should not be approved," said Hinchey, who noted, "While I'm not opposed to drilling, it must be done with the most oversight and regulation."

Sinding — like Wes Gillingham of Catskill Mountainkeeper — called for the DEC to start the regulations process over again because there's no analysis of the "cumulative impact" of drilling.

All of which makes the DEC's job of balancing environmental protection with the development of natural resources even tougher.
"It's an extremely complicated process," said the DEC's executive deputy commissioner, Stuart Gruskin.

sisrael@th-record.com

********************************************************************************* 

From: Oil & Gas Investments Bulletin

Fracking Fluids Part I: A Controversy Coming to an Energy Investment Near You by admin on March 4, 2010

***************************************************************************************

From: Liz Bucar's Blog:  Breathing is Political March 5, 2010 Post 

Gas Drilling : Sullivan County’s Hazards Mitigation Plan

In early January 1987, emergency sirens in Cochecton, Lake Huntington and Callicoon shattered the cold afternoon.* The children and I stared fearfully at the Plektron© where it sat on its living room shelf crackling with meager details. Like any good fire chief’s wife, I didn’t pick up the phone to call him. He’d ring us the minute he had a chance.

Slowly, painfully, news reached us. A train had derailed just behind the Callicoon hospital on route 97. A chemical had spilled and was filling the air with caustic vapor.

Snow and mud were making access difficult. All we knew for certain was that several train cars had jumped the track and were lying on their sides.

For hours, the nature and toxicity of the chemical remained unknown but our husbands, brothers and sons were having trouble seeing and breathing. The Ladies Auxiliaries prepared coffee and sandwiches that remained undelivered. We were banned from the site. Our unanswered questions floated in the air around us, “Where’s Conrail? What kind of poison is it? What’s happening to our men?”

Barely two miles south of the spill, as our eyes and throats began to tingle, we learned that young Doc Salzberg had rolled up his sleeves and was helping to evacuate the hospital. There were too few ambulances for speed or efficiency.

The baby in my belly kicked as my own fear rose. At some point, I remembered to feed his brother and sisters and thanked the fates we weren’t amongst the families being forced from their homes.
That was the night we learned there were serious holes in our county-wide disaster response.

Within weeks of the incident, local leaders, representatives of ConRail and our Congressional representatives gathered at the Cochecton Firehouse and began to rectify the situation. It was an admirable and worthy effort on the part of a small county with minimal resources and to this day, I couldn’t be more grateful for the care our leaders showed.

Fast forward to 2010 and Sullivan County is asking residents to help update its All-Hazard Mitigation Plan by completing and returning its Hazard Mitigation Questionnaire by March 31, 2010. According to Sullivan County’s Division of Planning and Environmental Management, “[The questionnaire] can be mailed, faxed or emailed to Michael Brother at Barton and Loguidice, the consulting firm that is conducting the plan update. His contact information is listed on the first page of the questionnaire.”

Although the questionnaire does not address gas drilling or hydraulic fracturing specifically, comments concerning the gas extraction industry and its potential for disastrous accidents can be appended at the last page of the questionnaire.

In December 2009, the Cornell Law School Water Law Clinic submitted its comments on the Draft Supplemental Generic Impact Statement (dSGEIS) issued by New York State’s Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC). The report stated, “...[DEC's] current staffing incapacties must be remedied….To demonstrate the critical need for additional field staff, principal tasks specifically identified in the Chapter 7 of the dSGEIS are summarized in the 15-page Memorandum…”

In turn, the Memorandum states unequivocally, “…. The scope and extent of these tasks are clearly beyond the capacity of the DEC.” (Cornell comments dsgeis) (Cornell Law School WLC Memo)

During Mayor Calvin Tillman’s recent tour of upstate New York and Pennsylvania, the DISH, Texas official was asked, “If a well catches fire in Texas, do local firefighters get called in?”

“No,” he answered. “We go to the scene but even emergency responders aren’t allowed on a site. Even if they were, most don’t have special training. If a relief valve goes off, our emergency responders show up and just wait for the guy to turn it off. We can’t get access.”

According to the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) 2000 report on compliance in the Oil and Gas Extraction Industries, “Oil and gas extraction facilities are inspected much less frequently (46 months between inspections on average) than facilities in most other industries… and the enforcement to inspection ratio (0.05) is among the lowest of the included industries.” (Page 121: Environmental Protection Agency’s Compliance Assistance Notebooks: Oil and Gas Extraction Industry) In a chart on page 120 of the report, the “enforcement to Inspection Rate” in Region 2 (including New York State) was 0.17% while Region 3’s rate (including Pennsylvania) was .04%. (More recent data was unavailable at the site.)

So, if oversight and enforcement of the gas drilling industry “is beyond the capacity of the DEC,” and the enforcement ratio was already abysmal during Clinton’s “boom times” in the 1990s, what disaster mitigation can we expect now in cash-strapped Sullivan County relative to gas drilling and hydraulic fracturing?

Here are a few clues:

if residents see a possible gas drilling spill or other emergency, we’re encouraged to call the EPA’s newly-established TIPLINE (877-919-4EPA) or email the Agency at eyesondrilling@epa.gov
of the 30-plus gas extraction States in the US, only Pennslvania and New York have no severance tax on the industry. States that have the tax use its revenue for, among other things, community services and infrastructure;
under emergency conditions, the FRAC Act (S1215 – 5 sponsors, HR2766 – 51 sponsors) would require gas extractors to reveal the fracturing toxins used at a particular site. Unfortunately, it’s nowhere near passage and consequently, there is no reason to believe emergency personnel would know the nature of the chemical soup confronting them.

Nonetheless, as Sullivan County’s Manager, David Fanslau says, “Federal law requires that the municipalities of Sullivan County develop and implement local hazard mitigation plans in order to obtain future FEMA grant monies for hazard mitigation. These plans must be updated every five years. Upon final approval from FEMA, Sullivan County and each participating municipality must formally adopt and approve the plan.”

In light of FEMA’s requirements and the potential harm from drilling activities, Breathing suggests the following:

Download a copy of Sullivan County’s current Disaster Mitigation Plan and complete the Hazard Mitigation Questionnaire. It isn’t complicated and won’t take long! (Be sure to append your concerns about gas drilling on its final comment page);

Download and read a copy of “A Gas Drilling Research Task Force Report for Sullivan County.” (Its emergency mitigation recommendations are excerpted below this article);**

Let the Sullivan County Legislature know whether those mitigation recommendations satisfy your concerns in the event of a gas drilling accident in our county;

Encourage the Sullivan County Legislature to hold public meetings where residents can hear from, and ask questions of, our Commissioners of Public Health, Public Works, Planning and the County’s emergency responders;
Ask your Town, Village and County representatives if they were present in Narrowsburg on February 19, 2010 when Mayor Tillman met with local officials to discuss his and his residents’ experiences with the gas industry in DISH, Texas;

Ask your County Legislator to propose and/or support a Resolution demanding that New York State maintain a moratorium on gas drilling until cumulative impact studies have been conducted on the industry and drilling; until Congress completes its investigation of the industry’s practices; until residents can be assured of adequate oversight and enforcement of the industry; until New York State has a severance tax which can be used to train emergency personnel and maintain our infrastructure; and until the FRAC Act has been passed and communities have full-knowledge of the toxins we’ll confront in an emergency.

Some County Legislators can be be contacted here and if you’re not sure which District is yours, look on this Legislative District map.

Individual Town websites will have contact information for your Supervisor and Town Board.
*************

**Sullivan County’s Gas Drilling Task Force Report. Its Emergency Mitigation portion is excerpted here:

“Along with impacts to local road infrastructure, emergency management issues are another concern at the local level. Interviews with Emergency
Management counterparts in other parts of New York State indicate that gas drilling companies have been very good to allow the emergency services (police, fire and EMS) to attend training sessions which explain how and where a drilling operation will be set up to include a site visit and hands on question sessions. In summary, our investigation has shown that most natural gas production wells are located in the Western part of the state and the Emergency Service agencies in those counties have reported no fire or health hazardous to be associated in there areas for the past twenty plus years. A few safeguard measures and protocols must be instituted:

We must be provided with a list of operational telephone numbers and email addresses of management contacts and especially emergency contacts that can be called in the event of an incident near or at a drill site.

Each well site will need a 911 address and access information (gate and lock locations plus access) to ensure that emergency response units can access the site. As will be discussed in the section to follow, the driveway permit process at the town level can be integrated with 911 addressing provided by the Sullivan County Division of Planning. As will be discussed in the next section, the driveway permit forms will need to be revised to require a site plan showing the drilling site and driveway access, as well as photos of the site before construction, after a well is installed and after any subsequent change (e.g., when a well is capped or abandoned) requiring a change in or addition to the NYS DEC permit).

Interface with NY Alert to inform Sullivan County residents of a chemical spill or gas fire.

Communicate with the public about the importance of registering on-line with NY-Alert to secure receipt of notifications of emergencies.
Transportation of waste water/or fracing fluid should be reviewed with emergency response agencies by each operator of a drill site.
Emergency management personnel should have access to, or know, the contents of the fracing fluids, to know how to treat injuries and protect the health of emergency personnel and medical staff.

For the purposes of health treatment by EMS units and hospital ER’s, the exact contents of the fluid should be on record so that proper treatment is made available.

Municipal emergency management staffs need to interact with DEC Region 3 Office and the Mineral Division of the DEC to understand the use of blow out preventers during drilling operations to understand how to control unexpected flows of gas which could result in fires. Along with the DEC, municipal emergency management staff should witness a blow out preventer test prior to drilling.

Local emergency management personnel should understand the gas flaring procedure and the layout of flow lines. As for pipeline transport of product through the existing natural gas line or new lines as built, we already have emergency reporting information and training as to how to response to a natural gas line break. This information is updated yearly by the Columbia Gas Transmission Company with their contractor for safety:Paradigm Liaison Services, Wichita, KS.
***************

*Here’s a NY Times reference to what we subsequently learned was an acetaldehyde spill behind the Callicoon Hospital in 1987:
DERAILMENT IN UPSTATE NEW YORK CALLICOON, N.Y., Jan. 4 (AP) -Twenty-seven cars of a Conrail freight train derailed in a wooded area near the Delaware River this evening, discharging a hazardous chemical from one car and forcing the evacuation of several homes and a small hospital, state police officials said.
****************

Resources you might find helpful as you fill out the County’s Hazard Mitigation Questionnaire:

Environmental Protection Agency’s Emergency Planning and Community-Right-To-Know Act

Environmental Protection Agency’s Compliance Assistance Notebooks: Oil and Gas Extraction Industry

 

 

***************************************************************************************

DEC rules ensure adequate protection for the state's air, land and water.

by Independent Oil and Gas Association of New York ALBANY, NY (03/03/2010)(readMedia)-- Proponents of natural gas exploration petitioned the governor, lawmakers and regulatory agencies and lawmakers to allow drilling to be expanded in New York's Southern Tier and Western Catskills.

More than 4,300 people have so far signed an online petition already, which reminds elected officials and regulators that harvesting clean-burning natural gas in New York will heat our homes, spur our economy, reduce our dependence on foreign oil for decades to come and bring thousands of job and billions of dollars to New York.

The petition, sponsored by the Independent Oil & Gas Association of New York, will remain open to those interested in urging decision-makers to form objective and scientific opinions on whether expanded natural gas exploration is right for New York. It is available at www.marcellusfacts.com.

"We are very pleased that many so right-minded New Yorkers have spoken up." said Brad Gill, IOGA of NY executive director. "New York's leaders have to focus on this tremendous opportunity for our communities and our state, instead being distracted by bad science and misinformation being spread by obstructionists who don't actually understand our work and history of environmental stewardship."

The petition follows a Jan. 25 outdoor rally in Albany, where 700 landowners and supporters raised their voices in support of natural gas extraction through a process known as hydraulic fracturing – or "fracking." The delegation represented 23 landowner groups and 17,500 families.

The fracking process will help release natural gas locked in the Marcellus Shale formation by injecting pressurized water, sand chemicals and other ingredients to shatter the rock. It occurs deep underground and far from groundwater and surface water, and it has been performed safely in New York and nationwide for decades.

IOGA-NY was founded in 1980 to protect, foster and advance the common interests of oil and gas producers, as well as professionals and related industries in the State of New York.

**********************************************************************************

Dave ColavitoFreelance writer
Posted: March 2, 2010 10:31 AM Governor Paterson's Parting Shot
Fracking , Marcellus Shale , Natural Gas Drilling , New York , Sullivan County , New York News 


There's no question New York State faces unprecedented budgetary challenges, so it's understandable that policy makers would be searching far and wide for potential revenue generators. However recent developments should cause all state residents to ask, "at what cost"? For Sullivan County, that cost is too high.

State Senator John Bonacic and Town of Thompson Supervisor Tony Cellini deserve credit for standing on the side of fiscal prudence. They recognize that pumping $6 million into infrastructure upgrades associated with renovating the Concord Hotel at this time is a waste of taxpayer dollars.

They recognize what's widely acknowledged; the Concord project is on life-support, and that's being generous, considering it's been a year since any pulse has been detectable there.

The Governor's decision to release this money is beyond difficult to understand because Sullivan County is in the midst of its own unprecedented fiscal crisis: a new jail estimated at $80 million, $36 million for landfill monitoring and maintenance over the next 30 years, and, by my math, an estimated $42 million in landfill debt service through 2022 - all this in addition to whatever reductions will be mandated from Albany.

We could have used that money to address these real issues facing our communities. But the Governor decided to fund a project that arguably may never see the light of day. Taken by itself it's indicative of the same run-away spending he has cited as the cornerstone for New York's economic woes, and exemplifies the dysfunction and double-speak that so many have sadly come to expect from Albany.

But you can't take this by itself, because it's not alone.
Governor Paterson is also pushing, hard, for natural gas extraction from Sullivan County and surrounding areas proximate to the New York City watershed. This, in spite of serious concerns expressed by agency professionals and the public that the risks have yet to be adequately addressed. The party line has been drilling is safe and will be tightly regulated. But regardless of where you stand on this issue, the Governor's 34% proposed reduction in Department of Environmental Conservation's funding contained in his submitted budget is cause for more than just concern.

We do not yet know how much of this proposed reduction will make its way into DEC's Division of Minerals Resources, the division responsible for ensuring compliance with State regulations. We do not yet know how many gas wells will ultimately get drilled in the Marcellus Shale formation. What we do know is that while the folks at Minerals may be fine folks, they are still just folks, not endowed with superhuman attributes. Our State's 14,000 active wells and 2,500 active mines already place responsibilities for over 1,000 mineral sites per Division inspector. With deep budget cuts likely and a significant increase in responsibilities, you don't need to be a genius to understand how that math will go.

Governor Paterson has decided not to run for office in November. I am asking that he take into consideration, in a credible way, the needs of area residents who don't have the luxury of running anywhere. Sullivan County residents will be living here long after he leaves office.

 

**********************************************************

From pressconnects.com of Binghamton, NY

DEC standards high

February 28, 2010, 12:00 am
The controversy about drilling in the Marcellus Shale reserves hit the state legislature in Albany big time on Jan. 25. One TV station estimated 700-plus people came to demonstrate their support for this new gas industry in a rally that took place in the pouring rain.

Given the scaremongering of the environmental extremists who have weighed in on this issue, the most important disclosure at this rally was the fact that more than 10,000 wells have been drilled in New York over the last two decades under present regulations with only one minor incident involving methane seepage which was corrected within three days.

This safety record is a testament to the professionalism of the DEC and the high standards already incorporated into state law with respect to natural gas exploration and production.

Noel van Swol: President

Sullivan-Delaware Property Owners Association

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Marcellus Already Drilled Plenty In New York State; Not A Threat To Water Supply March 1st, 2010 by ndarbonne |

“…The major amount of the Marcellus play will not be underneath the New York City water supply anyway….”

There has been plenty of drilling through the Marcellus shale in New York—enough to estimate the potential for recoverable gas reserves from the rock—says Dr. Terry Engelder, professor of geosciences at Pennsylvania State University, and Ralph Williams, principal and founder of well analysis and petroleum engineering firm Reservoir Visualization Inc.

If the Marcellus has been penetrated a great deal already why would penetrating it now create any new threat to water supply there? “You are asking a question that really verges on the political rather than the scientific,” Engelder says in the webinar “Marcellus G&G—The View From The Subsurface” presented by OilandGasInvestor.com and UGcenter.com and now available for viewing on demand.

“As far as I can tell, the major hold-up (in drilling the Marcellus) in New York state involves the fact that some of the Marcellus occurs underneath the Catskill Mountains water supply to New York City. Gas production there is always the concern the environmentalists have. Until the (gas-drilling) operators (and I) can convince the public that the fear over hydraulic fracturing and its ability to pollute ground water—until that is abated, until the public becomes convinced and has confidence in the facts we have—then the politicians will remain uneasy.

“It is a PR job that needs to be done and I am confident that, eventually, the politicians will come to understand that, first of all, the major amount of the Marcellus play will not be underneath the New York City water supply anyway and, secondly, subsurface activity at the depth the Marcellus is found is not in any way going to endanger the near-surface water supplies.”
In the past 29 months, Engelder has discussed the Marcellus’ potential in 129 forums before more than 7,000 industry and non-industry members. He estimates that 117 Appalachian Basin counties could become economic for Marcellus pay, and he estimates the ultimate recovery (EUR) after 50 years of production decline at 867 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of gas on a P10 basis and 220 Tcf on a P90 basis.

The economic production he forecasts would come from 17 New York counties, 42 in Pennsylvania, 18 in Ohio, 39 in West Virginia and one in Maryland. His estimate is based on assumption of a power-law rate-decline model in which 70% of the sections produce and spacing is 80 acres.
Engelder says a great deal about the Marcellus in New York is known from penetrations of it in developing the Oriskany sandstone gas-storage fields. “I remind you that the Oriskany is below the Marcellus so, as a consequence of that type of drilling activity, we know about a lot of the details. Some of the real cross-sections show the Marcellus.”

Some areas especially pop. “It is very clear that, in areas such as Broome County…Tioga County and Chemung County, I think that’s an area where I think the Marcellus will work very well, providing that the state legislature lets the operators do their thing there, which has so far been a problem.”
Williams’ firm has data on more than 3 million U.S. oil and gas wells, including 30,000 wells that have penetrated the Marcellus. He says Marcellus well data is especially transparent in New York. “We have a lot more control in New York. First, the Marcellus is a lot shallower and actually goes to outcrop (there). Now how far the black shales and hot (high API gamma ray) shales do continue to outcrop where they transition from gas-bearing to water-bearing will be determined as drilling progresses up into New York, but you definitely have all of the Marcellus intervals active in New York and should be productive.”

Could any of New York’s Marcellus gas be drained via wells in Pennsylvania? “Absolutely none,” says Engelder. Williams adds, “I concur with Terry on that question. If you look at other shale plays, they’re down-spaced to 160s- and 80-acre spacing to drain these reservoirs, so it’s going to take a lot of drainage points and they don’t drain large distances.”
Engelder concludes, “The Marcellus represents one of the world’s greatest opportunities for gas-shale production, and America itself is set up to capitalize on this with other (shale) plays…One of the challenges for the operators…is to further engage the politicians to help them come to the understanding of the magnificence of this particularly resource and the opportunity it offers in American industry to expand and…to slow down the flow of cash out of America. To bring in (foreign) petroleum, it seems to me to be so unnecessary given the size of the resource America has in the form of natural gas.”

Williams, who presented in the webinar while in the field in Pennsylvania, says of the Appalachian Basin, “This is an amazing basin. It is one of the venerable basins and, as we talk to the people and the operators here, it’s been a long time coming for the Appalachian Basin to be in the spotlight for the U.S. and there is a lot of hydrocarbon in the Marcellus and the many other zones in all of the basins in the country and we look forward to developing that.”

For more details on Appalachia’s Marcellus play, including state-by-state and county-by-county estimates for economic production potential, click to the webinar “Marcellus G&G—The View From The Subsurface” now available for viewing on demand.

The webinar includes transcript and slides from the DUG-East conference panel “Meet the Marcellus: Geology, Geophysics, and Potential,” including remarks by Dr. John (Jack) A. Ward, executive vice president, E&P, for PetroEdge Energy LLC, on “Marcellus Shale Porosity Distribution Based on Regional Mapping;” Williams on “The Detailed Stratigraphic Framework of the Marcellus Shale;” James Coleman, U.S. Geological Survey, Eastern Energy Resources Team, on “Examination of Potential Factors Affecting Successful Exploration and Production;” and Doug Pferdehirt, president, reservoir-production group, for Schlumberger, on “Completions in the Marcellus Laterals.”

Nissa Darbonne (ndarbonne@hartenergy.com), E-Editor, Hart Energy Publishing; Oil and Gas Investor, A&D Watch, Oil and Gas Investor This Week, OilandGasInvestor.com Today, OilandGasInvestor.com, A-Dcenter.com, UGcenter.com, UGcenter.com Today, EPmag.com, E&P Buzz, PipeLineandGasTechnology.com, PGT News, HartFUEL.com, FUEL.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cracking Down on Fracking


Mike Markham of Colorado has an explosive problem: His tap water catches fire. Markham demonstrates this in a new documentary, “Gasland,” which just won the Sundance Film Festival Special Jury Prize. Director Josh Fox films Markham as he runs his kitchen faucet, holding a cigarette lighter up to the running water. After a few seconds, a ball of fire erupts out of the sink, almost enveloping Markham’s head.

Mike Markham of Colorado has an explosive problem: His tap water catches fire. Markham demonstrates this in a new documentary, “Gasland,” which just won the Sundance Film Festival Special Jury Prize. Director Josh Fox films Markham as he runs his kitchen faucet, holding a cigarette lighter up to the running water. After a few seconds, a ball of fire erupts out of the sink, almost enveloping Markham’s head.

The source of the flammable water, and the subject of “Gasland,” is the mining process called hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking.”
Fracking is used to access natural gas and oil reserves buried thousands of feet below the ground. Companies like Halliburton drill down vertically, then send the shaft horizontally, crossing many small, trapped veins of gas and oil. Explosive charges are then set off at various points in the drill shaft, causing what Fox calls “mini-earthquakes.” These fractures spread underground, allowing the gas to flow back into the shaft to be extracted. To force open the fractures, millions of gallons of liquid are forced into the shaft at very high pressure.

The high-pressure liquids are a combination of water, sand and a secret mix of chemicals. Each well requires between 1 million and 7 million gallons of the fluid every time gas is extracted. Drillers do not have to reveal the chemical cocktail, thanks to a slew of exemptions given to the industry, most notably in the 2005 Energy Policy Act, which actually granted the fracking industry a specific exemption from the Safe Drinking Water Act. California Congressman Henry Waxman, chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, has just announced an investigation into the composition of the proprietary chemicals used in fracking. In a Feb. 18 letter, Waxman commented on the Safe Drinking Water Act exemption: “Many dubbed this provision the ‘Halliburton loophole’ because of Halliburton’s ties to then-Vice President Cheney and its role as one of the largest providers of hydraulic fracturing services.” Before he was vice president, Dick Cheney was the CEO of Halliburton.

In an earlier investigation, Waxman learned that Halliburton had violated a 2003 nonbinding agreement with the government in which the company promised not to use diesel fuel in the mix when extracting from certain wells. Halliburton pumped hundreds of thousands of gallons of toxic, diesel-containing liquids into the ground, potentially contaminating drinking water.

According to the Department of Energy, there were more than 418,000 gas wells in the U.S. as of 2006. Since the Environmental Protection Agency lacks authority to investigate and regulate fracking, the extent of the pollution is unknown. Yet, as Josh Fox traveled the country, becoming increasingly engrossed in the vastness of the domestic drilling industry and the problems it creates, he documented how people living near gas wells are suffering water contamination, air pollution and numerous health problems that crop up after fracking. It’s personal for Fox: He lives in Pennsylvania, on a stream that feeds into the Delaware River, atop the “Marcellus Shale,” a subterranean region from New York to Tennessee with extensive natural gas reserves. Fracking in the Marcellus Shale could potentially contaminate the water supplies of both New York City and Philadelphia. Fox was offered almost $100,000 for the gas rights to his 19 acres, which led him to investigate the industry, and ultimately to produce his award-winning documentary.

There is virtually no federal oversight of fracking, leaving the budget-strapped states to do the job with a patchwork of disparate regulations. They are no match for the major, multinational drilling and energy companies that are exploiting the political goal of “energy independence.” The nonprofit news website ProPublica.org found that, out of 31 states examined, 21 have no regulations specific to hydraulic fracturing, and none requires the companies to report the amount of the toxic fluid remaining underground.
Reports indicate that almost 600 different chemicals are used in fracking, including diesel fuel and the “BTEX” chemicals: benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes, which include known carcinogens.

Dr. Theo Colborn, zoologist and expert on chemical pollution from fracking, appears in “Gasland,” saying, “Every environmental law we wrote to protect public health is ignored. ... We can’t monitor until we know what they’re using.”

Fox ends “Gasland” with an excerpt of a congressional hearing. Rep. Diana DeGette, D-Colo., and Rep. Maurice Hinchey, D-N.Y., aggressively question gas industry executives about water contamination. The two have submitted a bill, the proposed FRAC Act, which would remove the “Halliburton loophole,” forcing drillers to reveal the chemical components used in fracking. It’s time to close the door on the Cheney energy policy and take immediate steps to protect clean water.

Denis Moynihan contributed research to this column.
Amy Goodman is the host of “Democracy Now!,” a daily international TV/radio news hour airing on more than 800 stations in North America. She is the author of “Breaking the Sound Barrier,” recently released in paperback and now a New York Times best-seller.
© 2010 Amy Goodman
Distributed by King Features Syndicate

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

From: New Tang Dynasty Television-February 20, 2010
To Drill or Not to Drill: A Dilemma for New York State

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Published by the Times-Herald Record 02-21-2010
Texan warns Sullivan about gas drilling--Read Article Here
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Thursday, February 18, 2010

If New York Doesn't Drill for Gas, Let Them Buy West Virginia's
New York has been reluctant to allow horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing in the Marcellus Shale, because of concerns about contamination of underground water supplies. I think those fears are completely unwarranted, but they are driving significant opposition.

Here's an open letter to the citizens of New York from Jerry Simmons, leader of a royalty owners group based in Tulsa. He explains why the drilling is not a danger, and the economic benefit that is posed by the drilling. Frankly, I hope he fails to change any minds in New York, for the reasons he gives at the end of his letter. I'd just as soon see that money being paid to West Virginia royalty owners. New York will keep burning gas, wherever it comes from.

Times-Herald Record 02-18-2010

Bonacic, NYC in face-off over gas-drilling banSenator says city should buy landowners' drilling rights

By Steve Israel
Times Herald-Record
Posted: February 18, 2010 - 2:00 AM
If New York City wants to ban gas drilling in its vast watershed — and it does — it should pay those who want to lease their land to gas companies, says state Sen. John Bonacic, R-C-Mount Hope.

For months, the city and environmental groups have called for a ban on natural gas drilling in the watershed, a small portion of which sits in Sullivan County.
Drilling there would pollute the city's unfiltered drinking water, New York City politicians such as

Mayor Michael Bloomberg and the city's Department of Environmental Protection say.
Gas drilling talk on SaturdayMayor Calvin Tillman of DISH, Texas will speak about the negative affects of gas drilling on his town at a public health and gas drilling panel discussion 4 p.m., Saturday, at the Delaware Youth Center, Callicoon.

But the state has resisted the calls for a ban in its proposal for new regulations in the gas-rich Marcellus shale. Since 70 percent of the land in the watershed is privately owned, a ban would be illegal, state Department of Environmental Conservation Commissioner Pete Grannis has said.

Now, Bonacic, who says drilling is safe, is calling the bluff of the city — and environmental groups, who hope a watershed ban would mean a drilling ban throughout the state.
"Let them buy the development rights," he says. "For those landowners who want to sell their gas rights, let the city pay the same market rate to keep the land undeveloped. We buy agricultural development rights for tracts of land we want to preserve. Let those who oppose the lawful exploration and extraction of gas in the Catskills (do the same)."
While the city's DEP points out that it has already invested $541 million to buy watershed land, it did not directly address Bonacic's proposal, except to reiterate the "unacceptable threats" of drilling to drinking water.

"We look forward to continuing a dialogue with elected officials and all stakeholders to protect the watershed during this process," said a statement by Environmental Protection Commissioner Cas Holloway.

But Bonacic, born and raised in Manhattan, says the call for a ban on watershed drilling is one more example of the city's insensitivity to the rights of upstaters.
"If New York City can stop development of energy sources in the Catskills," he said, "they can diminish the value of people's land without compensation."

sisrael@th-record.com

 
 
ADDED:  2-17-2010
New York State Senator Thomas K. Duane (D, WF) 29th Senate District
DRILL WATCH LINK HERE

SULLIVAN COUNTY PARTNERSHIP PRESENTS:
A Regional Effort to Identify Opportunities to Improve SEQRA
Thursday, March 11th - 4 PM
Bernie’s Holiday Restaurant – Rock Hill
RSVP to cori@scpartnership.com by March 4t
h
An initiative-- (Regarding Natural Gas Drilling in Sullivan County, NY ) paneled by Pattern for Progress, the DEC and Scenic Hudson has resulted in draft recommendations regarding potential improvement to the implementation of SEQRA in the Hudson Valley and Catskills.
Comments are due by March 17th. This roundtable meeting will allow developers, lawyers, engineers and other stakeholders to share experiences, air thoughts and contribute ideas that can be distilled into comments which will be sent to the panel for review
before suggestions are forwarded to the DEC Commissioner.
Confirmed Speakers:
Jonathan Drapkin, President of Pattern for Progress
Willy Janeway, Regional Director of Region 3 DEC
  
 
  
From the River Reporter Newspaper: VOLUME XXXVI No. 05 Narrowsburg, NY February 4, 2010  
The incident at Robson well
 
We probably all agree that if gas drilling is to be done in the Upper Delaware, a precious watershed that provides fresh water to 25 million people, it needs to be done in a prudent manner, with good oversight and rapid remediation of any problems. And with that as our goal, the recent train of events at the Robson well site in Wayne County, PA are extremely troubling. The timeline of events at the Robson well suggests that the regulatory system in Pennsylvania, as it currently stands, has some dangerous gaps that must be repaired if this region is to have a reasonable hope of preserving the quality of its soil, water and air.
Gap number one is the fact that the company in question, Chesapeake Energy, LLC, did not apparently notice or report the damaged vegetation which provided the clue that contamination may have occurred. This is one type of gap we can’t ever expect to be completely closed. While there is a growing movement of some energy company stockholders to make sure that corporations act in an environmentally responsible manner, for-profit corporations are fundamentally designed to get certain jobs done and maximize profits for their shareholders; we cannot assume that they will always monitor the consequences assiduously, as was borne out only too clearly in the case of the Millennium Pipeline in Sullivan County.
It is precisely because this first type of gap can occur that regulatory agencies are necessary. But here’s where the second gap occurred: the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) did not detect the potential problem either. Their first notification came in the form of an email from Tom Kane of The River Reporter. We, in turn, only knew about the danger signals at Robson because a citizens’ group, Damascus Citizens for Sustainability (DCS), took the extraordinary step of chartering an airplane to fly above the site and take photographs. This type of chain of circumstances is scarcely one that can be relied upon to be repeated in future instances. (Though it is worth noting that the Environmental Protection Agency has recently established a hotline to encourage citizen vigilance and provide a place to report problems with natural gas drilling. See page 4.)
In order to be sure to detect similar incidents, the DEP would have to have plenty of boots on the ground. But currently there is only one oil-and-gas inspector and one water-quality inspector assigned to the office overseeing the Wayne County area. Some improvement can be expected: Governor Ed Rendell has just announced that there will be funding for a substantial state-wide increase in DEP personnel. It remains to be seen, however, if the increase in inspection personnel in particular will be substantial enough to keep an adequate eye on the thousands of new wells for which applications have been filed.
Another step that might help close the gap in detecting problems would be a strict protocol for inspecting wells at the time of closure. The agency told us that it does eventually inspect completed well sites, though it also said that “there is no requirement to do so.” But the Robson case tells us that such inspections are not necessarily conducted expeditiously, which means that any problems that do occur will have time to fester, migrate or, as in the instance of air contamination, become untraceable. We also think that if the DEP does not currently have to conduct such inspections, then there should be a new law or rulemaking that makes it mandatory.
The final gap in the regulatory system revealed by the Robson well incident is in transparency. After being notified of the potential problem, the DEP did nothing to communicate either with the DCS or with the general public, via the press, about the results of its inquiry. It was only in response to a specific request of ours that we obtained the updates published in our story “Contaminant confirmed at Robson site” (see December 24, 2009 issue).
Especially in the early days of gas drilling in our area, it is crucial for regulatory agencies to be completely and proactively open with regard to any pollution problems that occur. It is only in the light of such full disclosure that the best mechanisms can be developed going forward for monitoring, preventing and, where prevention fails, remediating pollution at drilling sites.
The Robson well was only the second natural gas well drilled in our area. Statistically, that’s far from enough to conclude that we can expect a 50 percent failure rate in handling toxic-spill incidents. But it is more than enough for us to urge regulatory agencies to study and learn from the failures that occurred, and to do whatever it takes to see that the Robson mistakes are not repeated with the thousands of new wells expected to come on line.
 
 
 Pa. tightens gas-drilling regulationsMore inspectors, new rules aim to boost public's safety
By MARC LEVY
The Associated Press
Posted: January 31, 2010 - 2:00 AM FROM THE TIMES HERALD RECORD
HARRISBURG, Pa. — Pennsylvania is taking new steps to ensure public safety amid a rush to drill into what geologists believe could become the nation's largest natural gas field, Gov. Ed Rendell said Thursday.
The state plans to hire more inspectors to monitor a growing number of well sites and is writing tougher rules to prevent gas from leaking into nearby homes and water wells, Rendell said.
He called them "decisive, progressive protections for the people of Pennsylvania."
Among other things, 68 new well inspectors would be hired to join the more than 100 already on staff. The proposed new rules would also lower maximum well pressures, raise standards for well cement and pipes, and require drilling companies to restore water supplies they pollute.

More inspectors neededOne of the concerns of environmentalists in New York, which is proposing new regulations for drilling, is that the state doesn't have enough staff to inspect future wells.
The rules were available on the Web site of the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, which is accepting public comments on them for 30 days before it plans to submit them to a rule-making board.
An industry group, the Marcellus Shale Coalition, said in a statement that it supports the state's moves, as did several environmental groups that say drilling could put the environment and public health at risk without more protection.
However, Erika Staaf of PennEnvironment pointed out that the proposed rules were drafted without the public's input.
Myron Arnowitt, director of Clean Water Action's Pennsylvania chapter, said more staff is also needed for the department's other bureaus, such as its water-quality division.
"One of our concerns is that a lot of the impact from the drilling is found in our rivers and streams and our drinking water," Arnowitt said.

Gas rush is onIn the past three years, dozens of gas companies have flocked to Pennsylvania in hopes of tapping into the huge Marcellus shale gas formation that lies beneath much of the state.
All told, the department has issued more than 2,500 drilling permits since the beginning of 2005, when the current wave of activity on the gas field began. Thousands more could be issued this year.
Meanwhile, the industry has drilled or is drilling more than 1,000 wells. Department staff conducted fewer than 15,000 inspections last year on the more than 120,000 active oil and gas wells in Pennsylvania. Environmental concerns Exploration of the Marcellus shale formation to date has not been without what critics call environmental consequences.
In early January, the department fined Atlas Energy Inc. $85,000 for alleged violations at 13 well sites in southwestern Pennsylvania from late 2008 through July 2009.
Atlas did not take all precautions to prevent runoff, and it spilled diesel fuel and other industrial fluids onto the ground, the department said. In addition, the department determined last year that 13 residential drinking-water wells in northeastern Pennsylvania were polluted by Cabot Oil & Gas Corp.'s nearby drilling.
Cabot agreed to pay a $120,000 fine.
Times Herald-Record staff writer Steve Israel contributed to this report.
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
FROM: THE SULLIVAN COUNTY DEMOCRAT 1-26-2010
Reaction to NYC's stance on gas drilling Part 2 of 2
By Dan Hust
SULLIVAN COUNTY — December’s unveiling of a report on gas drilling by the New York City Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) struck local advocates and officials differently.
As specified in the December 29 Democrat, the report indicated deep concerns over drilling’s potential environmental impact to New York City’s upstate watershed, which includes the Town of Neversink and tiny portions of the towns of Fallsburg and Liberty.
As a result, the city is pushing for a ban on gas drilling in the entire West-of-Hudson watershed spanning much of the Catskills – even though the majority of property within that watershed is privately owned.
The NYS Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) has now closed its public comment period and is expected to finalize new drilling rules in mid-2010.
Meanwhile, we solicited comments from several locals about the report and the DEP’s stance. All but the following were included in this past Friday’s edition:
Ramsay Adams and Wes Gillingham are the executive director and program director, respectively, of Catskill Mountainkeeper, a Youngsville-based environmental advocacy group.
“As previously reported in this paper, the New York City Department of Environmental Protection has categorically stated that drilling in the New York City drinking water supply area must not be allowed,” said Adams.
“They base this conclusion on the findings of two independent expert consulting groups commissioned by the city to study the potential of gas drilling in the New York City watershed. The experts’ opinions are that ‘high-volume hydrofracking and horizontal drilling pose unacceptable threats to the unfiltered fresh water supply of nine million New Yorkers.’
“We don’t blame New York City for wanting to protect their water supply, and we support the work they have done to help determine the risks. But the big ‘a-hah’ moment here is that all of Sullivan County and all of New York State are exposed to the same risks, and no drilling should take place anywhere in the state until it can be proven safe.
“The science cited by the DEP is corroborated by geologists, biologists and hydrogeologists hired by Catskill Mountainkeeper” and others, Adams added.
“Our experts say that the potential for long-term contaminant transport to the near-surface aquifers is real. They unequivocally state that injecting fluids into the shale will definitely cause conditions that make transport of contaminants from the shale to surface aquifers possible. This is a total contradiction of what the DEC and the gas industry have been telling us for the last 2 years.
“But the largest red flag yet for the proposed gas drilling in New York State comes from PEF/Encon, the union that represents the roughly 2,000 DEC staff. Today they called on the DEC to slow down and hold off on permitting for gas wells until there’s more information and the holes in the dSGEIS are filled.”
According to Catskill Mountainkeeper’s Program Director Wes Gillingham, “What is wrong for New York City is also wrong for Sullivan County.… While recent discussions have been focused on the science, it is very important not to forget what the impact of drilling will be on the communities here in Sullivan County.
“With the responsibility falling on to local governments for road maintenance resulting from drastic increase of heavy vehicles, for hospitals that will have to cope with accidents, for fire and emergency response personnel, etc., our local infrastructures will be incredibly stretched and very likely broken.”
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FROM:  THE SULLIVAN COUNTY DEMOCRAT 12-31-2009

City’s concerns with drilling extend to entire county
By Dan Hust
NEW YORK CITY — According to the New York City Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), gas drilling in the New York City drinking water supply area must not be allowed.
“Based on the latest science and available technology, as well as the data and limited analysis presented by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), high-volume hydrofracking and horizontal drilling pose unacceptable threats to the unfiltered fresh water supply of nine million New Yorkers,” said Acting DEP Commissioner Steven W. Lawitts last week.
“New York City has invested $1.5 billion to protect the watershed and prevent degradation of the water supply, and to maintain its Filtration Avoidance Determination (FAD),” he continued. “The known and unknown impacts associated with drilling simply cannot be justified.”
The DEP has also demanded the DEC redo its draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement (dSGEIS), for which public comments are being accepted through this Thursday.
The dSGEIS, when finalized next year, is intended to add to the existing GEIS regulating drilling statewide, addressing new technologies including fracking and horizontal drilling.
Most drilling companies interested in New York – especially in Sullivan County, where potential yields from the gas-rich Marcellus Shale are estimated to be high – have been waiting for the DEC to finish the SGEIS and define the new regulatory landscape.
However, DEP considers the dSGEIS flawed and incomplete, not taking into enough account cumulative impacts nor specific impacts to the city.
DEP officials are basing their concerns on a study they commissioned via two consulting groups. For the past year, the consultants have researched available data on drilling in areas across the U.S., including the recent surge in activity in Pennsylvania.
They’ve concluded that even the presence of one gas well in the city’s 1,585-square-mile West-of-Hudson watershed could endanger one or more of the six reservoirs and associated tunnels.
Concerns noted in the 90-page report swirl around contamination of the water supply, not just by polluted surface water and spills but by underground migration via aquifers and, more significantly to the city, infiltration of chemicals used in the fracking process via fault lines in the rock – some of which apparently intersect the various water tunnels crossing the Catskills.
“Tunnels were designed to keep water in, not to withstand external pressures,” noted DEP Deputy Commissioner Paul Rush in his recent comments to the city’s Water Board.
The city is also worried about what it fears will be a mass “industrialization” of the watershed area, with estimates of potential wells topping 6,000, leading to as much as 7 million truck trips over the next two decades. Consultants based these estimates on activity in the Barnett,
Haynesville and Fayetteville shale plays in the U.S.
For those worried about gas drilling’s environmental costs, the report is significant because it identifies potential impacts that would obviously not be limited to the city’s watershed. (Only the Town of Neversink and tiny slivers of the towns of Liberty and Fallsburg are included in that watershed in Sullivan County.)
For now, however, county officials are waiting on the DEC to take the next step.
County Planning Commissioner Luiz Aragon pointed out that the county has already submitted its comments on drilling to the DEC, sharing some of the concerns raised by the DEP (though the county’s comments were submitted before the DEP’s report was released).
“The question remains,” Aragon concluded, “what will be done with those comments?”
Comments are being accepted through December 31 and can be e-mailed to dmnsgeis@gw.dec.
state.ny.us, mailed to dSGEIS Comments, Bureau of Oil & Gas Regulation, NYSDEC Division of Mineral Resources, 625 Broadway, Third Floor, Albany, NY 12233-6500, or submitted online at www.dec.ny.gov/cfmx/extapps/SGEISComments.
Copies of the DEP report and related comments can be obtained at www.nyc.gov/html/
dep/html/press_releases/09-15pr.shtml.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
City Officials Say Drilling in Watershed Has Risks 


By SINDYA N. BHANOO-New York Times
Published: December 23, 2009
New York City environmental officials said Wednesday that months of scientific research had indicated that hydraulic drilling for natural gas upstate could contaminate the watershed serving the city.
The study, undertaken by the city’s Department of Environmental Protection, also showed that the drilling could damage infrastructure, including aqueducts, the officials told the city’s water board at a briefing.
In a forceful letter to the State Department of Environmental Conservation on Tuesday, the city’s acting environmental commissioner, Steven W. Lawitts, called on the state to withdraw its draft regulations approving the drilling. Yancey Roy, a spokesman for the state agency, said it had no comment.
The draft regulations apply to a technology called hydraulic fracturing in the Marcellus Shale region of New York, which includes the city’s watershed region in the Catskills. The watershed area spans a million acres and provides unfiltered drinking water to about 8.2 million people in New York City and a million people in Westchester, Putnam and Dutchess Counties.
A public comment period on the rules, released by the state environmental agency in September after months of discussions, ends on Dec. 31.
Already concerned about the watershed, the city’s environmental department hired scientists and environmental engineers who specialize in gas drilling last January to research the potential impact of the drilling. The report concludes that drilling is dangerous for several reasons.
Extracting gas from the shale involves blasting water mixed with chemicals into the rock at a high pressure, which causes the natural gas to flow out. But the process results in significant amounts of wastewater, which can contaminate water supplies and damage the infrastructure, the report found.
Twenty percent to 50 percent of the chemicals used in extraction ends up in the wastewater, for which the state has no disposal method, said Paul Rush, the department’s deputy commissioner, who presented the report at the briefing.
He added that the projected operating costs would increase water rates for New York City residents by at least 30 percent because an increase in filtering costs.
Mr. Rush said the environmental engineers and scientists hired by the department collected data from hydraulic fracturing in other states to draw their conclusions.
“We took a technical look at this and made a decision based on the science,” he said.
Citing data from drilling in Fayetteville, Ark., the scientists estimated that drilling in the New York watershed could result in hundreds of tons of chemicals per day seeping through the watershed over a 20-year period.
Substantial industrial development would be needed to dig and maintain the 3,000 to 6,000 wells in the watershed, the report said. Maintenance alone could result in up to 600,000 trips by truck per year within the watershed’s boundaries, it said.
Responding to rising public concern, the Chesapeake Energy Corporation, which owns the lease to drill in the watershed, announced in October that it did not plan to drill in the watershed under its lease.
Nonetheless, hundreds of New York City residents turned out in November to protest hydraulic drilling at a state hearing on the draft regulations. Eric A. Goldstein, a senior lawyer for the Natural Resources Defense Council and an advocate for protection of the watershed, said Wednesday that Chesapeake’s promise meant little.
“It’s nonbinding, it’s temporary and it only applies to one company,” he said at the water board’s meeting. “Other companies could take over the lease, or Chesapeake could choose to go in and drill if they renew the lease.”
Mehul Patel, a member of the water board, also spoke out against the drilling at the meeting. “We’re trading off the most precious natural resource we have,” he said. “It’s appalling to me that the state would consider this.”
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeffersonville, NY 12748
Natural gas drilling is an issue here in Sullivan County, NY-- perhaps a big one. The Marcellus Shale Formation may significantly impact just about everything in our little piece of God's Green Earth. Keeping current is prudent.

The implications for real estate here are considerable. The debate will most likely continue for years to come. Check here from time to time to follow the thread.
For articles on this topic from the Times-Herald Record Daily Newspaper:
http://search.recordonline.com/?q=gas%20drilling&source=thr
View my blog at:  http://catskills4you.blogspot.com/  for opinons on this and other topics relevant to Sullivan County Catskills Real Estate.
John Kavaller-Realtor and Licensed NYS Agent
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
From:  New York State Senator:  JOHN J. BONACIC
November 11, 2009

The issue of natural gas drilling is of growing importance to the people of the Catskills and Hudson Valley. As you may be aware, the so-called Marcellus Shale is home to large deposits of natural gas. The Marcellus Shale region in New York can be seen on this map:
http://www.dec.ny.gov/energy/46381.html

The State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) has provided an extensive amount of information on gas drilling on their website:
http://gasleasing.cce.cornell.edu/  

It is important that landowners contemplating leasing their land for natural gas development, and the neighbors of those who are leasing their land, are aware of the right questions to ask when it comes to natural gas exploration and drilling.

Several organizations have published informative guides on issues relating to natural gas exploration. Attorney General Andrew Cuomo has offered this guide on oil and gas leases and also has published a list of eight tips landowners should always think about when it comes to gas leasing.

Cornell Cooperative Extension has also created a natural gas development resource center on their website for landowners to use.

Links to both Attorney General Cuomo's publications and Cornell Cooperative Extension's Natural Gas Development Resource Center are found below:
http://www.oag.state.ny.us/bureaus/environmental/pdfs/Gas%20Brochure%20-%20final%20rc%20edit%208.20.pdf

http://www.oag.state.ny.us/bureaus/environmental/pdfs/gashandout-single.pdf

http://gasleasing.cce.cornell.edu/

If you are contemplating leasing your land rights for natural gas exploration, I urge you to read the information contained on those websites prior to signing a lease. While those guides are no substitute for obtaining independent legal advice, they are very solid starting points to make sure you ask the right questions, receive top profit if you do choose to lease your land, and protect your land.

In addition to those guides, I have introduced legislation (S.6269), which requires the DEC to consider bonding requirements for natural gas drillers to protect peoples' water supply. Although the DEC tells us that it is very unlikely any water supply could be contaminated, I still feel it is important to property owners that their water be protected.

I strongly believe the United States needs energy independence. The natural gas in the Marcellus Shale can help with that independence, and diminish the need for projects like NYRI, which threatened our region for three years. I encourage any landowners who are considering leasing their land (and any neighbors of those who are considering leasing), to read the guides linked to this email, make an informed decision to both protect your property, and receive the economic benefits you are entitled to if you choose to lease your land.

Sincerely,
JOHN J. BONACIC
State Senator